Association of physical activity and sedentary behavior with urinary incontinence in adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Higher physical activity was associated with lower odds of urinary incontinence in adult women, while sedentary behavior showed no clear link.
*Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies; Level 2a (OCEBM).
*Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies; Level 2a (OCEBM).
Citation
Sánchez-Martín C, Vila-Maldonado S, Leal-Martín J, et al. Association of physical activity and sedentary behavior with urinary incontinence in adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2026; (May):1286–1305. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.11.024.
Background
Urinary incontinence is common in women and can reduce quality of life. Lifestyle factors such as physical activity may affect risk, but prior results have been mixed and often limited to specific subgroups.
Patients
Adult women (≥18 years) in observational studies; excluded pregnant/postpartum women, athletes, women with major pelvic surgery, neurologic disorders, or certain cancers.
Intervention
Higher physical activity (definitions varied across studies).
Control
Lower physical activity.
Outcome
Urinary incontinence prevalence or new-onset urinary incontinence (overall and by type: stress, urgency, mixed).
Follow-up Period
Cross-sectional or 2 to 11.5 years (longitudinal studies).
Results
Forty-three studies (295,513 women) were included; 25 studies (166,744 women) were pooled in meta-analyses. Study quality was generally fair.
| Analysis | Outcome | Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-sectional (highest vs lowest activity) | Any urinary incontinence (primary) | 0.70 (0.60–0.82) |
| Cross-sectional (highest vs lowest activity) | Mixed urinary incontinence | 0.57 (0.40–0.80) |
| Longitudinal (highest vs lowest activity) | New-onset any urinary incontinence (primary) | 0.82 (0.75–0.89) |
| Longitudinal (highest vs lowest activity) | New-onset stress urinary incontinence | 0.77 (0.65–0.92) |
| Longitudinal (highest vs lowest activity) | New-onset urgency urinary incontinence | 0.69 (0.48–0.99) |
| Longitudinal (highest vs lowest activity) | New-onset mixed urinary incontinence | 0.66 (0.48–0.92) |
Limitations
Because included studies were observational, the findings cannot prove that physical activity prevents urinary incontinence. Most studies used self-reported activity and symptoms, and activity definitions varied. Sedentary behavior evidence was sparse and mostly cross-sectional. Residual confounding (for example, differences in weight, childbirth history, or health status) is likely.
Funding
Spanish public research funders and European Union funds; funders had no study role.
Clinical Application
Encourage regular physical activity as part of incontinence prevention counseling; do not assume reducing sedentary time alone lowers risk. Consider other risk factors and patient comfort.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
In this systematic review/meta-analysis of observational studies, higher physical activity was associated with lower incident urinary incontinence (longitudinal OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75–0.89). Given residual confounding and self-reported measures, how valid/applicable is this for counseling patients, without implying causality? In this observational meta-analysis, the pooled longitudinal odds ratio for higher physical activity and incident urinary incontinence was 0.82. Which interpretation is most appropriate?