Time to Follow‑Up Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test with Centralized Patient Navigation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Centralized telephone navigation increased follow-up colonoscopy completion and shortened wait time after a positive fecal immunochemical test in federally qualified health centers.
*Randomized clinical trial (sub-analysis); Level 1b (OCEBM).
*Randomized clinical trial (sub-analysis); Level 1b (OCEBM).
Citation
Ganguly AP, O’Leary MC, Crockett SD, et al. Time to Follow‑Up Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test with Centralized Patient Navigation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2026;41(6):1534–1544. doi:10.1007/s11606-025-10151-2.
Background
Delays in follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool blood test are linked to worse colorectal cancer outcomes. Under-resourced clinics often face more missed or delayed follow-up; navigation programs may help.
Patients
Adults in two federally qualified health center systems in North Carolina who completed a fecal immunochemical test and had a positive result (n=89); analysis included the first outreach round only.
Intervention
Centralized, telephone-based patient navigation to support scheduling, preparation, and practical barriers, in addition to usual care.
Control
Usual care alone (clinic notification and referral process without systematic navigation).
Outcome
Colonoscopy completion within 1 year (primary) and mean time to colonoscopy over 1 year using restricted mean survival time (days).
Follow-up Period
12 months.
Results
| Outcome | Intervention | Control | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colonoscopy completed by 1 year (primary) | 69.0% (40/58) | 38.7% (12/31) | Absolute increase 30.3%; NNT=4 |
| Mean time to colonoscopy over 1 year (primary) | 157.0 days | 237.4 days | 80.4 days faster (95% confidence interval 13.6–147.1) |
Analyses were intention-to-screen.
Limitations
Small positive-test sample (n=89) with wide uncertainty for timing estimates. Conducted in rural North Carolina during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may limit generalizability. Colonoscopies done outside available records could have been missed. Findings about advanced growths are hard to interpret because more patients in the intervention group completed colonoscopy.
Funding
National Institutes of Health; university cancer research funds; private gifts.
Clinical Application
For patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test in under-resourced clinics, add centralized phone navigation to increase and speed follow-up colonoscopy; evidence supports adoption.
Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion question (1)
In this randomized clinical trial sub-analysis of 89 FIT-positive FQHC patients, centralized telephone navigation increased 1-year follow-up colonoscopy completion (69.0% vs 38.7%) and shortened restricted mean time by 80.4 days; what threats to validity or context-specific factors should we weigh before adopting navigation in our setting?
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.