Personalized Blood Pressure Targeting After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Reopening-guided blood pressure targets improved 90-day independence after stroke clot removal.
*Randomized clinical trial; Level 2 (OCEBM).
Citation
Camps-Renom P, Guasch-Jiménez M, Álvarez-Cienfuegos J, et al. Personalized Blood Pressure Targeting After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurology. 2026;83(8):788-797. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.1706
Background
After successful clot removal for severe ischemic stroke, the safest blood pressure target is uncertain. Prior trials of uniformly intensive blood pressure lowering showed no benefit or possible harm, so this study tested a more individualized approach.
Patients
440 previously independent adults in Spain with anterior-circulation large-vessel ischemic stroke and successful vessel reopening after endovascular therapy. Key exclusions included posterior-circulation stroke, large early brain injury, heart failure, arterial dissection, or untreated vessel narrowing of 50% or more.
Intervention
For 72 hours, systolic blood pressure target depended on reopening quality: 140-160 mm Hg for partial reopening; 100-140 mm Hg for near-complete or complete reopening.
Control
Guideline-recommended systolic blood pressure less than 180 mm Hg.
Outcome
Primary outcome: functional independence at 90 days, defined by modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 (0=no symptoms; 6=death).
Follow-up Period
90 days.
Results
| Outcome | Intervention | Control | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional independence at 90 days (primary) | 60.0% | 47.1% | OR 1.71 (95% CI 1.17 to 2.50); NNT 8 |
| Better overall disability score distribution | Favored intervention | — | OR 1.43 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.00) |
| Bleeding into damaged brain tissue at 24 hours | 22.3% | 31.6% | OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.95); NNT 11 to prevent one event |
Results were intention-to-treat. Symptomatic brain bleeding, early neurological worsening, serious adverse events, and 90-day mortality were not significantly different. The control reflected then-current guideline care.
Limitations
The trial stopped early because funding ended, reducing precision. Few patients had only partial vessel reopening, limiting conclusions for that subgroup. Patients with major untreated vessel narrowing were excluded, so results may not apply to higher-risk patients with poor blood flow reserve. Clinicians and patients were not blinded, although outcome assessors were.
Funding
Spanish public and European funds; funders had no study role.
Clinical Application
Consider individualized post-thrombectomy blood pressure targets in stroke centers, but await confirmation before replacing guideline-based practice broadly.
Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.