Tricuspid-Valve Intervention in Heart Failure
*Randomized controlled superiority trial; Level 2 (OCEBM 2011).
Citation
Hausleiter J, Stocker TJ, et al. Tricuspid-Valve Intervention in Heart Failure. New England Journal of Medicine. Published August 30, 2026. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2606934.Background
Severe leakage of the tricuspid heart valve is linked to worsening heart failure and death. Prior randomized trials showed better quality of life after catheter-based repair, but effects on hospitalization and survival were uncertain.Patients
360 adults with symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation despite at least 30 days of adjusted diuretic therapy, plus high risk for future heart-failure events. High risk meant recent heart-failure hospitalization or kidney or liver congestion. Detailed exclusions were in the supplement; all patients had catheter testing to avoid unsuitable pressure profiles.Intervention
Catheter-based tricuspid-valve repair plus medical therapy.Control
Medical therapy alone.Outcome
Primary: death, heart-failure hospitalization, and quality-of-life improvement using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (0 to 100; higher is better).Follow-up Period
Primary quality outcome: 1 year; clinical events: up to 3 years.Results
| Outcome | Key finding |
|---|---|
| Primary hierarchical outcome at 1 year | Win ratio 2.42 (95% CI 1.76 to 3.33), favoring repair |
| Death or heart-failure hospitalization through 3 years | Hazard ratio 0.40 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.55); event-free survival 52.4% vs 21.0% |
| Death through 3 years | Hazard ratio 0.62 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.96) |
| Heart-failure hospitalization through 3 years | Hazard ratio 0.35 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.50) |
| Quality-of-life score change at 1 year | Mean difference 6.89 points (95% CI 1.76 to 12.02) |
CI = confidence interval.
Analyses were by intention to treat. Number needed to treat to prevent one death or heart-failure hospitalization at 1 year was 4 (95% CI 3 to 6). A 15-point quality-of-life improvement was prespecified as clinically meaningful. Medical therapy alone was the current nonsurgical comparator. The composite benefit was mainly driven by fewer heart-failure hospitalizations, though death was also lower by 3 years.