Morphine for chronic breathlessness (MABEL) in the UK: a multi-site, parallel-group, dose titration, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial
Long-acting morphine did not relieve chronic breathlessness. Phase 3 multi-site, parallel-group, double-blind randomized controlled trial; Level 1b (2011 OCEBM).
Background
Opioids reduce exertional breathlessness in lab studies, but clinical effectiveness in daily life remains uncertain.
Patients
Ambulant adults with chronic breathlessness (mMRC ≥3) mainly due to chronic lung disease; UK, 11 centers. mITT: 140 (morphine 73; placebo 67); mean age 70.5; 66% men.
Intervention
Oral modified-release morphine 5 mg twice daily, optional uptitration to 10 mg twice daily at day 15; blinded laxative; 56 days.
Control
Matching placebo morphine and placebo laxative.
Outcome
Primary: Worst breathlessness (0–10 NRS) at day 28. Secondary: Physical activity (actigraphy), cough NRS, quality of life, sedation, cognition, adverse events.
Follow up period
Primary at 28 days; treatment to 56 days; safety to 84 days.
Results
| Outcome | Morphine | Placebo | Effect (95% CI) | NNT/NNH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary worst breathlessness (NRS) day 28 | 6.19 | 6.10 | Adj. mean diff 0.09 (–0.57 to 0.75) | — |
| Secondary cough (NRS) day 56 | 2.53 | 3.94 | Adj. mean diff –1.41 (–2.18 to –0.64) | — |
| Moderate–vigorous activity day 28 (min/day) | 63.0 | 53.4 | Adj. mean diff 9.51 (0.54 to 18.48) | Signal |
| Adherence ≥90% (day 28) | 88% | 99% | –11% absolute | — |
| Withdrew study drug (≤56 days) | 17.8% | 3.0% | +14.8% absolute | NNH 7 |
| ≥1 adverse event (≤56 days) | 86% | 76% | +10% absolute | NNH 10 |
| ≥1 serious adverse event (≤56 days) | 17.8% | 4.5% | +13.3% absolute | NNH 8 |
| Deaths (≤56 days) | 2/73 | 1/67 | No treatment-related deaths | — |
Limitations
- No standardized isotime/isoload exercise test.
- Cough measure lacks established MCID; multiple comparisons.
- Population mostly respiratory disease; women and minorities under-represented.
- Suboptimal laxative; some missing withdrawal data.
Funding
NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme; public funder, low bias risk.
Citation
Johnson MJ, Williams B, Keerie C, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2025;13:967–77. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00205-X.