Intensive BP targets modestly improve quality

Targeting SBP <120 mm Hg modestly improved HRQoL without harm. Multicenter open-label, blinded-outcome randomized controlled trial; Level 1b (2011 OCEBM).

Background

Whether more aggressive blood pressure lowering improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been uncertain.

Patients

Hypertensive adults ≥50 years with high cardiovascular risk (prior stroke allowed); 10,804 analyzed (intensive n=5,398; standard n=5,406) from 11,255 randomized.

Intervention

Treat to office SBP <120 mm Hg.

Control

Treat to office SBP <140 mm Hg.

Outcome

Primary (HRQoL analysis): change in EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS; 0–100; MCID=7 points). Secondary: proportion with meaningful improvement/worsening (≥7-point change), EQ-5D utility index, domain categories (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression).

Follow up period

Median 3.36 years (IQR 3.04–3.44).

Results

Outcome Intensive Standard Effect (95% CI) NNT/NNH
Primary: Change in EQ-5D VAS +0.56 −0.50 Mean difference +1.26 (0.55 to 1.98) NA
Clinically meaningful improvement (≥7 points) 37.9% 36.3% RR 1.16 (1.04 to 1.30); ARR 1.6% NNT 63
Clinically meaningful worsening (≥7 points) 28.8% 30.5% ARR 1.7% (favoring intensive) NNT 59 (to prevent one worsening)
EQ-5D utility index (change) −0.0365 −0.0463 Difference +0.010 (0.002 to 0.017) NA
Domain category changes No between-group differences across 5 domains NA

Limitations

  • HRQoL measured only at baseline and study end; transient effects not captured.
  • ~4% missing final HRQoL; potential but unlikely bias.
  • Ceiling effect: 63% at maximum utility at baseline.
  • Open-label design; generalizability largely Chinese settings.

Funding

Chinese government grants; free drugs; Servier research support—possible sponsor bias.

Citation

Huang X, Zhang H, Li Y, et al. Modest Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure–Lowering on Quality of Life in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk: The ESPRIT Trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2025;86(17):1392–1401. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.06.010.