High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults With Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of the DANFLU-2 Randomized Clinical Trial
In adults 65 years or older, a high-dose influenza vaccine modestly reduced several hospitalization outcomes compared with a standard-dose vaccine, with similar benefit in people with and without diabetes.
*Pragmatic open-label randomized clinical trial (secondary analysis); Level 1b.
*Pragmatic open-label randomized clinical trial (secondary analysis); Level 1b.
Citation
Nielsen AB, Johansen ND, Modin D, et al. High-dose vs standard-dose influenza vaccine in older adults with diabetes: a secondary analysis of the DANFLU-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2026;186(3):311-320. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.7286
Background
Older adults, especially those with diabetes, have higher risks of severe illness from influenza. High-dose influenza vaccines prevent influenza infection better than standard-dose vaccines, but evidence for severe heart and lung outcomes in diabetes has been limited.
Patients
Adults 65 years or older in Denmark (2022/2023 to 2024/2025 influenza seasons); no formal exclusion criteria. Total: 332,438 participants; 43,881 had diabetes.
Intervention
High-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (single seasonal injection).
Control
Standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine.
Outcome
Hospitalizations for combined heart/lung disease, heart disease, influenza, lab-confirmed influenza, and heart failure; comparison by diabetes status and diabetes subgroups.
Follow-up Period
From 14 days after vaccination to May 31 each season.
Results
| Outcome | High-dose vs standard-dose (relative reduction) | NNT |
|---|---|---|
| Hospitalization for any heart/lung disease | 5.7% (1.4% to 9.9%) | 1000 |
| Hospitalization for any heart disease | 7.2% (1.5% to 12.5%) | 1000 |
| Hospitalization for influenza | 43.6% (27.6% to 56.2%) | 2132 |
| Hospitalization for lab-confirmed influenza | 35.9% (22.3% to 47.2%) | 1678 |
| Hospitalization for heart failure | 19.5% (3.3% to 33.1%) | 3205 |
Effects were generally similar in participants with and without diabetes. In exploratory subgroup analyses, people with diabetes for more than 5 years appeared to benefit more for some outcomes.
Analysis was intention-to-treat.
Limitations
Secondary and subgroup analyses were not the main trial focus and involved multiple comparisons without adjustment, so some findings may be due to chance. The trial was open-label and relied on registry records. Although relative reductions were significant for several outcomes, the absolute benefits were small (high NNTs), which may limit day-to-day clinical impact.
Funding
Sanofi; additional support from Danish cardiovascular research foundations.
Clinical Application
For adults 65+ (including diabetes), consider high-dose influenza vaccine when available; absolute benefit is modest, but may be larger in longer-standing diabetes.
Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion question (1)
In this prespecified secondary analysis of a pragmatic open-label randomized trial, HD-IIV vs SD-IIV reduced influenza hospitalization similarly in participants with diabetes (rVE 41.6%, 95% CI 5.0%-64.7%). Given the neutral primary trial endpoint and exploratory subgroups, should this change vaccine choice for older adults with diabetes?
EBM quiz (1 question)
1. In this randomized trial analysis, the relative vaccine effectiveness of HD-IIV vs SD-IIV was broadly similar in adults with and without diabetes, but the number needed to vaccinate was lower in those with diabetes for several outcomes. What best explains this?
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.