Neonatal and obstetric outcomes following periconceptional exposure to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Early pregnancy exposure was not linked to major adverse outcomes.
*Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies; Level 2a.
Citation
Hakim J, Rajesh D, Tello JA. Neonatal and obstetric outcomes following periconceptional exposure to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2026; October:800-816.
Background
Use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists is rising among reproductive-age women with obesity or type 2 diabetes. Animal studies raised concern, but human pregnancy safety data have been limited.
Patients
Human singleton pregnancies with exposure from 3 months before conception through the first trimester. Exclusions included animal studies, multiple gestations, fetal chromosomal disorders, known teratogenic co-medications, and exposure stopped more than 3 months before conception.
Intervention
Periconceptional glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exposure, including semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, and related drugs.
Control
Unexposed pregnancies, often matched or grouped by obesity, type 2 diabetes, insulin use, metformin use, or general population controls.
Outcome
Congenital malformations, pregnancy loss, live birth, preterm birth, fetal growth, hypertensive pregnancy disorders, cesarean delivery, and neonatal outcomes.
Follow-up Period
Mostly through delivery; neonatal follow-up was limited.
Results
Twenty-two studies included 49,395 exposed pregnancies; 10 comparative studies entered meta-analysis.
| Outcome | Result |
|---|---|
| Major congenital malformations | NS |
| Cardiac malformations | NS |
| Renal malformations | OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.39) |
| Preterm delivery, live birth, pregnancy loss | NS |
| Hypertensive pregnancy disorders, cesarean delivery | NS |
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; NS: not statistically significant.
The renal finding was largely driven by one large cohort with baseline differences in obesity, diabetes control, hypertension, and kidney disease.
Limitations
All comparative evidence was observational, so residual confounding is likely. Exposure was often based on prescriptions, not confirmed use. Long-term child outcomes were largely unavailable, and rare defects remain hard to assess.
Funding
Jisc and University of St Andrews; no conflicts reported.
Clinical Application
Reassure after inadvertent early exposure, but continue advising discontinuation before conception and avoid routine use during pregnancy.
Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.