Primary Care Telemedicine vs In-Person Antibiotic Prescribing for Pediatric Respiratory Tract Infections
Among children with acute respiratory tract infections, primary care telemedicine visits had fewer antibiotic prescriptions than in-person visits without more follow-up care.
*Retrospective cross-sectional comparative study; Level 2c (OCEBM).
*Retrospective cross-sectional comparative study; Level 2c (OCEBM).
Citation
Ray KN, Wittman SR, Kelly MK, et al. Primary care telemedicine vs in-person antibiotic prescribing for pediatric respiratory tract infections. JAMA Network Open. 2026;9(5):e2610062. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.10062.
Background
Acute respiratory tract infections are a leading reason children visit primary care and receive antibiotics, many of which may be unnecessary. Prior work suggested higher antibiotic use in telemedicine outside primary care; quality within primary care was unclear.
Patients
Children younger than 18 years seen at 694 US pediatric and family medicine primary care clinics (2023). Excluded: pneumonia, bronchiolitis, COVID-19, influenza; well visits; other diagnoses needing antibiotics; missing key demographic/region data.
Intervention
Telemedicine primary care index visit.
Control
In-person primary care index visit.
Outcome
Antibiotic prescribed; antibiotic management matching guidelines for the recorded diagnosis; follow-up visits and later antibiotics within 14 days.
Follow-up Period
14 days.
Results
| Outcome (weighted) | In-person | Telemedicine | Absolute difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotic prescribed (primary) | 46.8% | 34.6% | -12.1 percentage points (95% CI, -19.3 to -5.0); NNT≈9 |
| Viral infection diagnosis | 55.6% | 66.9% | +11.3 points (95% CI, 4.5 to 18.2) |
| Middle ear infection diagnosis | 26.3% | 11.0% | -15.3 points (95% CI, -18.5 to -12.1) |
| Sinus infection diagnosis | 4.9% | 14.7% | +9.9 points (95% CI, 4.2 to 15.6) |
Analyses used propensity-score weighting to balance measured differences between visit types.
Limitations
Observational design cannot rule out unmeasured differences between patients choosing telemedicine vs in-person care. Diagnoses were taken from records (no independent confirmation), and follow-up outside primary care (urgent care or emergency visits) was not captured. Telemedicine visits were uncommon (about 2% of included visits), and the data could not reliably separate video from audio-only visits.
Funding
US National Institutes of Health; additional support from American Academy of Pediatrics and others.
Clinical Application
Offer telemedicine within established primary care for children with respiratory symptoms to reduce antibiotic use while monitoring diagnosis patterns and ensuring easy in-person escalation.
Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion question (1)
In this retrospective cross-sectional EHR study using propensity-score IPTW, telemedicine (vs in-person) ARTI visits had lower antibiotic prescribing (34.6% vs 46.8%; −12.1 percentage points). Given possible residual confounding and diagnosis-shift/mismeasurement, how confident are you this reflects better prescribing, and should it change your clinic’s telemedicine strategy?
EBM quiz (1 question)
1. The authors used propensity-score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to compare telemedicine vs in-person visits. What is the main goal of IPTW in this context?
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.