Four-year survival outcomes with dostarlimab plus chemotherapy in mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in the RUBY trial
*Phase 3 randomized controlled trial subgroup analysis; Level 2.
Citation
Powell MA, Roed H, Willmott LJ, et al. Four-year survival outcomes with dostarlimab plus chemotherapy in mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in the RUBY trial. Gynecologic Oncology. 2026;212:207-217. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2026.05.008Background
Chemotherapy alone was long the usual first treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, but survival was poor. This update tests whether adding dostarlimab provides durable benefit in a biomarker-defined group.Patients
118 adults with primary stage III/IV or recurrent dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer with low chance of cure by surgery or radiation. Patients needed adequate tumor tissue for biomarker testing.Intervention
Dostarlimab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel for 6 cycles, then dostarlimab maintenance for up to 3 years.Control
Placebo plus the same chemotherapy, then placebo maintenance.Outcome
Progression-free survival, overall survival, response duration, and safety.Follow-up Period
Median 55.6 months.Results
| Outcome | Dostarlimab benefit | 4-year rates | NNT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progression-free survival | HR 0.30 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.52) | 57.9% vs 15.7% | 3 |
| Overall survival | HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.63) | 72.8% vs 40.3% | 4 |
dMMR/MSI-H: mismatch repair deficient or microsatellite instability high; HR: hazard ratio; NNT: number needed to treat.
Median progression-free and overall survival were not reached with dostarlimab. A model estimated a 54% cure-potential rate with dostarlimab versus 14% with placebo. No new safety signals emerged; serious treatment-related events were more common with dostarlimab, and 2 treatment-related deaths occurred. Efficacy was analyzed by randomized assignment within this biomarker subgroup. Control was chemotherapy alone, the prior standard.
Limitations
Small subgroup size limits precision. Overall survival in this biomarker group was exploratory. Conditional survival and cure estimates were post hoc models, not proof of cure. GSK sponsorship and employee authorship may introduce bias. Results apply to advanced or recurrent biomarker-selected disease, not lower-risk endometrial cancer.Funding
Funded by GSK; employees coauthored, creating industry-bias concern.Clinical Application
Use dostarlimab with chemotherapy for eligible mismatch-repair-deficient advanced or recurrent disease; do not generalize to lower-risk endometrial cancer.Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion question (1)
In this phase 3 double-blind RCT of dMMR/MSI-H advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel reduced death risk versus chemotherapy alone (HR 0.34; 4-year OS 72.8% vs 40.3%); how should validity, toxicity, and applicability influence practice change?
EBM quiz (1 question)
1. In the RUBY randomized trial, overall survival had a hazard ratio of 0.34 for dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel versus placebo plus chemotherapy. Which interpretation is most accurate?
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.