Efficacy and Safety of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Co-agonists for Weight Loss Among Adults Without Diabetes: An Updated Systematic Review
*Systematic review of randomized trials; Level 1 (OCEBM).
Citation
Moiz A, Filion KB, Samuels AE, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Co-agonists for Weight Loss Among Adults Without Diabetes. Ann Intern Med. Published September 1, 2026. doi:10.7326/ANNALS-25-05519Background
Weight-loss medicines acting on gut-hormone pathways are increasingly used for obesity treatment. This review updates prior evidence as newer oral and combination drugs have been studied.Patients
Adults with overweight plus weight-related illness or obesity, without diabetes. Trials in specific clinical populations and those lasting under 16 weeks were excluded.Intervention
Glucagon-like peptide-1–based weight-loss medicines, including semaglutide, liraglutide, tirzepatide, orforglipron, and newer combination agents.Control
Mainly placebo, usually with lifestyle counseling.Outcome
Main outcome: percent body-weight change. Safety outcomes included digestive side effects, stopping treatment, serious side effects, and death.Follow-up Period
16 to 104 weeks.Results
Thirty-eight randomized trials included 25,816 participants. Quantitative pooling was not done.| Finding | Result versus placebo |
|---|---|
| Liraglutide | Up to −5.8% body weight (95% CI −8.0 to −3.6) |
| Subcutaneous semaglutide | Up to −14.8% (95% CI −16.2 to −13.4) |
| Oral semaglutide | Up to −14.3% (95% CI −17.2 to −11.4) |
| Orforglipron | Up to −12.4% (95% CI −15.1 to −9.7) |
| Tirzepatide | Up to −19.0% (95% CI −21.6 to −16.4) |
| Digestive side effects | 76.0% versus 40.1%; number needed to harm about 3 |
| Stopping due to side effects | 10.7% versus 3.4%; number needed to harm about 14 |
When feasible, outcomes used intention-to-treat analyses. A 5% weight loss is often clinically meaningful; most approved drugs exceeded this threshold versus placebo.
Limitations
Trial differences prevented pooled estimates. Safety reporting was inconsistent, follow-up was usually short, and direct comparisons between drugs remain limited.Funding
None; no apparent funder bias.Clinical Application
Offer these medicines to appropriate adults with obesity, balancing meaningful weight loss against frequent digestive side effects and long-term safety uncertainty.Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion question (1)
In this systematic review of 38 RCTs in adults without diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists/co-agonists produced placebo-subtracted weight loss up to −19.0% with tirzepatide and −23.9% with amycretin; how should heterogeneity, limited head-to-head data, and GI adverse events (76.0% vs 40.1%) affect practice change?
EBM quiz (1 question)
1. In the review, subcutaneous semaglutide 7.2 mg had a placebo-subtracted weight loss of −14.8% at 72 weeks. Which interpretation is most accurate?
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.