Revisiting the impact on mortality of intravenous iron administration during acute inpatient infections
Intravenous iron during acute infection did not reduce 90-day mortality in most hospitalized patients.
*Retrospective propensity-matched cohort study; Level 2 (OCEBM).
Citation
Wu R, Park YR, James LP, El-Fadel O, Bosch NA. Revisiting the impact on mortality of intravenous iron administration during acute inpatient infections. J Hosp Med. 2026;1-5. doi:10.1002/jhm.70457
Background
Iron deficiency anemia is common in hospitalized patients, but clinicians often avoid intravenous iron during infections because of concern it may worsen bacterial growth. A prior database study suggested a large survival benefit; this reanalysis tested whether that finding persisted after stronger bias adjustment.
Patients
Adults hospitalized from 2000 to 2025 with acute infection, iron deficiency anemia within 2 days, and antibiotic treatment. Exclusions included death within 7 days and intravenous iron in the prior 30 days.
Intervention
Intravenous iron within 7 days of infection-related hospitalization.
Control
No intravenous iron within the same 7-day window.
Outcome
All-cause mortality.
Follow-up Period
90 days after the hospital infection date.
Results
After matching, 27,796 patients were analyzed. Intravenous iron was not associated with lower mortality for bacteremia, pneumonia, colitis, or cellulitis.
| Infection group | 90-day mortality finding |
|---|---|
| Bacteremia | NS |
| Pneumonia | NS |
| Colitis | NS |
| Cellulitis | NS |
| Urinary tract infection, broad definition | 7.0% vs 8.4%; HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.95); NNT 72 |
HR = hazard ratio; NNT = number needed to treat; NS = not statistically significant.
The urinary tract infection benefit disappeared when less specific diagnoses were removed: HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.09). The analysis used a landmark approach similar to intention-to-treat.
Limitations
Observational design prevents causal conclusions. Coding errors, unmeasured illness severity, clinician selection of healthier patients for iron, and treatment crossover may bias results. Findings apply only to patients surviving at least 7 hospital days.
Funding
No funding; no reported conflicts.
Clinical Application
Do not change practice based on survival benefit claims; consider intravenous iron case-by-case during infection until prospective trials clarify safety.
Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.