Effectiveness of the 2025–2026 seasonal influenza vaccine among U.S. veterans: an observational study
The 2025–2026 flu vaccine modestly reduced flu-related emergency visits and hospitalizations among U.S. veterans.
*Target trial emulation cohort study; Level 2b (OCEBM).
Citation
Xie Y, Choi T, Al-Aly Z. Effectiveness of the 2025–2026 seasonal influenza vaccine among U.S. veterans: an observational study. eClinicalMedicine. 2026;100:104183. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104183
Background
Flu vaccine benefit varies each season, especially when circulating virus strains differ from vaccine strains. The 2025–2026 season was dominated by a changed influenza A(H3N2) strain, raising concern about reduced protection.
Patients
1,401,492 participant-trials among U.S. Veterans Affairs users with in-person primary care visits from September 15, 2025, to February 28, 2026. Exclusions included recent flu vaccination, recent flu infection, end-of-life or long-term care, advanced illness, recent emergency care or hospitalization, acute illness at the visit, and high predicted short-term hospitalization or death risk.
Intervention
Receipt of the 2025–2026 seasonal flu vaccine at the primary care visit.
Control
No seasonal flu vaccine at that visit or during follow-up.
Outcome
Primary: composite of flu-associated emergency department visit or hospitalization. Components were also analyzed separately.
Follow-up Period
Median 175 days, through May 7, 2026.
Results
| Outcome | Vaccine effectiveness | Absolute risk difference | NNT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emergency visit or hospitalization (primary) | 21.95% (95% CI 16.08 to 27.65) | 4.94 fewer per 10,000 (95% CI 3.47 to 6.49 fewer) | 2,024 |
| Emergency visit | 22.25% (95% CI 16.38 to 27.94) | 5.01 fewer per 10,000 (95% CI 3.53 to 6.55 fewer) | 1,996 |
| Hospitalization | 31.84% (95% CI 14.77 to 46.27) | 1.08 fewer per 10,000 (95% CI 0.44 to 1.82 fewer) | 9,259 |
CI = confidence interval; NNT = number needed to treat.
Analyses estimated per-protocol effects. The control was not current recommended preventive care. Emergency visits largely drove the composite result.
Limitations
Observational design leaves possible residual bias. Veterans were mostly older men, limiting generalizability. Vaccines or outcomes outside Veterans Affairs care may have been missed. Absolute individual benefit was small despite population-level value.
Funding
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; no funder role; unpaid Pfizer consulting reported.
Clinical Application
Continue offering seasonal flu vaccination; protection was modest but clinically relevant, especially for preventing severe flu outcomes during mismatch seasons.
Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.