Supporting asthma guideline-based management by integrating patient navigators.
Adding navigator-supported home visits modestly improved asthma control in high-risk adults.
*Randomized controlled factorial trial; Level 2 (OCEBM).
Citation
Apter AJ, Morales KH, Klusaritz H, et al. Supporting asthma guideline-based management by integrating patient navigators. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2026.09.009.
Background
Adults in low-income communities have higher asthma-related emergency visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. Patient navigators may help by improving access, visit preparation, communication, and attention to home and social needs.
Patients
350 adults with doctor-diagnosed moderate to severe asthma from low-income urban zip codes; most were Black women. Patients used inhaled steroid medicine and had a recent steroid course, emergency visit, or hospitalization for asthma. Key exclusions were not clearly reported.
Intervention
All received navigator-supported clinic preparation. Randomized additions were home visits, clinician feedback forms, or both.
Control
Navigator-supported clinic intervention alone, not usual care without navigation.
Outcome
Primary: asthma control score (0 to 6; lower is better) and asthma quality of life score (1 to 7; higher is better). Service use and prednisone use were secondary.
Follow-up Period
18 months: 3-month baseline, 12-month intervention, 3-month post-intervention observation.
Results
| Outcome | Comparison | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Asthma control (primary) | Clinic plus home visit vs clinic only | Mean difference -0.47 (95% CI -0.84 to -0.10) |
| Non-asthma hospital, emergency, or urgent visits | Clinic plus clinician feedback vs clinic only | -1.05 visits/year (95% CI -1.90 to -0.19) |
Analyses were intention-to-treat. The accepted minimally important difference is about 0.5 points for both primary scores; observed asthma control improvement narrowly missed this threshold, and quality-of-life differences versus control were not significant. Composite service outcomes were used; individual drivers were not reported.
Limitations
No group received usual care without a navigator, so the full navigator effect is uncertain. The pandemic shifted many home visits to virtual visits and may have changed asthma exacerbation rates. Service use was self-reported. Participants were a selected high-risk, low-income, mostly Black female group, limiting generalizability. Some statistically significant changes may not be clearly meaningful to patients.
Funding
National Institutes of Health; no company funding reported.
Clinical Application
Consider navigators for high-risk, low-resource asthma patients; evidence refines care but is not strong enough to mandate broad routine use.
Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.