Safety of Age-Adjusted and Clinical Probability-Adjusted D-dimer Cut-offs in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Adaptive D-dimer thresholds had very low missed pulmonary embolism rates while reducing imaging.
*Systematic review/meta-analysis of prospective diagnostic studies; Level 1.
Citation
Graziani M, Akerboom B, Freund Y, et al. Chest. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2026.09.030.
Background
Standard pulmonary embolism evaluation uses clinical judgment plus a D-dimer cutoff, often 500 ng/mL, to decide who needs chest imaging. Higher adjusted cutoffs may reduce unnecessary scans, but safety concerns remain.
Patients
12,194 adults with suspected acute pulmonary embolism in 6 prospective studies. Studies only enrolling children or pregnant patients were excluded.
Intervention
Age-adjusted or clinical-probability-adjusted D-dimer thresholds used to rule out pulmonary embolism without imaging.
Control
Conventional fixed D-dimer cutoff of 500 ng/mL; not tested through direct randomization in most studies.
Outcome
Diagnostic failure: confirmed clot, pulmonary embolism-related death, or unexplained death after pulmonary embolism was ruled out.
Follow-up Period
3 months.
Results
| Outcome | Pooled result | Patients/events |
|---|---|---|
| Overall diagnostic failure | 0.12% (95% CI 0.06% to 0.26%) | 7 events among 5,698 patients |
| Diagnostic failure in the adaptive window | 0.50% (95% CI 0.20% to 1.11%) | 7 events among 1,468 patients |
| Imaging avoided | 60.8% (95% CI 49.2% to 71.2%) | Across included studies |
Adaptive window: D-dimer above 500 ng/mL but below the adjusted cutoff.
Results came from prospective management studies. Some analyses excluded patients lost to follow-up, protocol deviations, or anticoagulation started for other reasons.
Limitations
No definitive direct randomized comparison with the fixed 500 ng/mL cutoff. D-dimer tests and algorithms varied. Subgroup evidence was limited for cancer, very old age, and pregnancy. Unexplained deaths may overestimate missed pulmonary embolism.
Funding
No external funding; no conflicts declared.
Clinical Application
Use validated adaptive D-dimer algorithms in low-risk suspected pulmonary embolism to safely reduce unnecessary chest imaging.
Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.