Telehealth Treatment of Anxiety in Patients With Low-Risk Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: The PACER Randomized Clinical Trial
Peer-supported online cognitive behavioral therapy modestly improved anxiety after low-risk emergency chest pain.
*Randomized clinical trial; Level 2 (OCEBM).
Citation
Musey PI Jr, Kroenke K, Connors JN, et al. JAMA Internal Medicine. Published online September 28, 2026. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.4225
Background
Most emergency chest pain is not due to a heart attack, but anxiety is common, often missed, and may drive repeat visits. This trial tested practical anxiety treatments started after emergency department discharge.
Patients
375 adults discharged from 6 emergency departments with low-risk chest pain and at least moderate anxiety. Exclusions included high heart-risk scores, hospital admission, active psychosis or suicidal thoughts, unstable vital signs, homelessness, incarceration, out-of-town residence, and inability to speak English.
Intervention
Peer-supported online cognitive behavioral therapy, or therapist-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy by telehealth. All groups received anxiety education.
Control
Recommended primary care follow-up plus anxiety education.
Outcome
Primary: anxiety score using Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (0 to 21; higher is worse). Secondary: global anxiety improvement, depression, physical symptoms, and disability.
Follow-up Period
12 months.
Results
| Outcome | Significant result |
|---|---|
| Anxiety score, online therapy vs primary care referral (primary) | 1.22-point greater improvement (95% CI 0.01 to 2.43) |
| Severe baseline anxiety subgroup | Online therapy improved 2.8 points more than primary care referral (95% CI 1.0 to 4.6) |
| Any patient-reported anxiety improvement | Online therapy: OR 3.1 (95% CI 1.7 to 5.8), NNT 6; therapist telehealth: OR 2.8 (95% CI 1.6 to 5.0), NNT 6 |
| Moderate or much better anxiety | Online therapy: OR 2.4 (95% CI 1.4 to 4.1), NNT 5; therapist telehealth: OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.8), NNT 5 |
OR = odds ratio; NNT = number needed to treat; CI = confidence interval.
No significant between-group differences were found for depression, physical symptoms, or disability. Analyses were intention-to-treat among participants with at least 1 follow-up assessment. The usual minimally important anxiety-score difference is about 2 to 3 points, so the overall average benefit was small; the severe-anxiety subgroup benefit was more clinically meaningful. The control was enhanced usual care, not no treatment.
Limitations
About one-third of therapy participants completed no sessions, and 20% had no follow-up assessment. The study occurred within one health system, limiting generalizability. The average anxiety benefit was statistically significant but below the usual threshold for a meaningful patient-perceived difference.
Funding
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; no funder role reported.
Clinical Application
Offer peer-supported online therapy mainly to emergency chest-pain patients with prominent anxiety, especially severe anxiety; it is feasible but not practice-changing for all.
Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.