Evaluation of Intervention Strategies to Improve Follow-Up Colonoscopy After Abnormal FIT/FOBT Result: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
*Systematic review and meta-analysis of mixed studies; Level 2.
Citation
Chua WY, Chew LX, Chan CKM, et al. Evaluation of Intervention Strategies to Improve Follow-Up Colonoscopy After Abnormal FIT/FOBT Result. JAMA Internal Medicine. Published online October 5, 2026. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.4827
Background
Stool blood tests reduce colorectal cancer deaths only if abnormal results are followed by colonoscopy. Follow-up rates are often far below recommended targets.
Patients
19,613 adults, mostly ages 50 to 75, with abnormal fecal immunochemical or occult blood tests. Studies without controls, non-English reports, abstracts, and nonintervention designs were excluded.
Intervention
Patient navigation, patient reminders, clinician reminders, automated referral, or multicomponent programs.
Control
Usual care or less intensive follow-up.
Outcome
Completion of follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool blood test.
Follow-up Period
1 month to 1 year; 2 studies did not specify.
Results
| Intervention | Effect on colonoscopy completion | Approximate absolute impact |
|---|---|---|
| Patient navigation | RR 1.24 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.33) | NNT about 10 |
| Patient reminders | RR 1.32 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.67) | NNT about 5 |
| Clinician reminders | RR 1.36 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.65) | NNT about 4 |
| Automated referral | RR 1.68 (95% CI 1.09 to 2.60) | NNT about 5 |
RR: risk ratio. CI: confidence interval. NNT: number needed to treat.
Overall, completion increased from 47.8% with control care to 69.1% after interventions, giving an approximate NNT of 5. Randomized trials used intention-to-treat analyses. Usual care was the current available approach.
Limitations
Interventions and follow-up timing varied widely, causing substantial heterogeneity. Nearly half the studies were nonrandomized. English-only inclusion, possible publication bias for navigation studies, and limited evidence on combined programs reduce certainty.
Funding
Singapore public research grants; funders had no role.
Clinical Application
After abnormal stool blood tests, use tracking, navigation, text reminders, and clinician alerts; evidence supports implementation but not one best strategy.
Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.