Improving Patient Safety Through Medication Reconciliation at Care Transitions: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review
Medication reconciliation during care transitions reduced medication errors, adverse drug events, readmissions, and emergency department visits.
*Mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis; Level 2a (OCEBM).
Citation
Feng D, Jin Z, Zou J, et al. Improving Patient Safety Through Medication Reconciliation at Care Transitions: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2026. doi:10.1007/s11606-026-10376-9
Background
Medication errors are common when patients move between care settings. Medication reconciliation is recommended, but the most effective ways to deliver it have been unclear.
Patients
Patients in 70 controlled studies undergoing care transitions, mainly hospital admission or discharge. Exclusions included non-English studies and studies of community patients only.
Intervention
Structured medication reconciliation programs, often pharmacist-led, using medication history collection, comparison, correction, documentation, and patient or team communication.
Control
Usual care at the study institution.
Outcome
Medication discrepancies, adverse drug events or reactions, readmissions, emergency department visits, death, and length of stay.
Follow-up Period
Most studies followed patients for 30 days; some followed 180 days.
Results
| Pooled outcome | Effect |
|---|---|
| Medication discrepancies | RR 0.39 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.53) |
| Adverse drug events or reactions | RR 0.61 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.79) |
| 30-day all-cause readmission | RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.78) |
| Emergency department visits | RR 0.60 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.68) |
| Drug-related readmission | RR 0.51 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.84) |
RR = risk ratio; CI = confidence interval.
Absolute event rates were not pooled, so numbers needed to treat could not be calculated. Pharmacist-led programs and medication reconciliation at hospital admission appeared especially effective. Usual care was the relevant current comparator.
Limitations
Many studies were nonrandomized, and medication discrepancy results were highly variable. Blinding was often impractical. Definitions, settings, and program components differed. Publication bias was possible. Benefits were less clear for 180-day outcomes, death, and length of stay.
Funding
Chinese government research grants; no company funding reported.
Clinical Application
Adopt structured medication reconciliation, preferably pharmacist-led and started at admission, to reduce preventable medication harm during transitions.
Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.