Oral anticoagulant monotherapy in patients with chronic coronary disease: An updated meta-analysis
In chronic coronary disease needing long-term anticoagulation, anticoagulant-only treatment reduced bleeding without increasing heart attack, stroke, or death versus adding one antiplatelet drug.
*Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials; Level 1a (OCEBM).
*Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials; Level 1a (OCEBM).
Citation
Ahmed M, Rana JS, Ahmed R, Fonarow GC. Oral anticoagulant monotherapy in patients with chronic coronary disease: An updated meta-analysis. The American Journal of Medicine. 2026;139:232–237. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.09.019.
Background
Many patients with stable, long-term coronary artery disease also need long-term blood-thinner treatment for other reasons (often atrial fibrillation). Adding an antiplatelet drug is common but can increase bleeding, so whether a single blood-thinner alone is safer without raising clot-related events is important.
Patients
Adults with chronic coronary disease requiring long-term oral anticoagulation (most had atrial fibrillation; many had prior coronary stenting).
Intervention
Oral anticoagulant alone.
Control
Oral anticoagulant plus one antiplatelet drug (aspirin or a clopidogrel-like agent).
Outcome
Primary composite: cardiovascular death, stroke, heart attack, and major bleeding; plus bleeding outcomes and clot-related outcomes.
Follow-up Period
Median 24.1 months (5 trials; 4,964 participants).
Results
| Outcome | Effect (anticoagulant alone vs combination) |
|---|---|
| Primary composite outcome (primary) | Risk ratio 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.53–0.85) |
| Major bleeding | Risk ratio 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.31–0.77) |
| Major or clinically important non-major bleeding | Risk ratio 0.50 (95% confidence interval 0.37–0.68) |
All-cause death, cardiovascular death, heart attack, stroke, and systemic embolism: NS.
Limitations
Bleeding results varied across trials; most participants were from Asian populations; event rates were low for some clot-related outcomes; drug types and doses differed.
Funding
No external funding; one author reported industry consulting outside this work.
Clinical Application
For stable chronic coronary disease needing long-term anticoagulation, consider stopping routine single antiplatelet therapy after the early stent period to reduce bleeding risk.
Journal Club
Discussion questions and an EBM quiz for this paper. How to run a journal club →
Discussion question (1)
In this meta-analysis of 5 RCTs, OAC monotherapy versus OAC plus antiplatelet therapy reduced the composite outcome (RR 0.68) and major bleeding (RR 0.49) without more ischemic events; how valid and applicable are these data for changing practice in your chronic coronary disease patients needing anticoagulation?
EBM quiz (1 question)
1. In this meta-analysis, OAC monotherapy had a pooled relative risk of 0.49 for major bleeding compared with OAC plus antiplatelet therapy. Which interpretation is most appropriate?
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.